MSME TALK™

MSME TALK File 5 (6)

The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026 marks a significant update to the MSMED Act, 2006. Passed by the Rajya Sabha on August 3, 2026 and by the Lok Sabha on August 7, 2026, the amendment comes at a time when India’s MSME ecosystem has expanded significantly in scale, digital adoption and economic importance.

The reforms focus on issues that directly affect day to day MSME operations, including late payments, payment disputes, digital platforms, registration, compliance and ease of doing business.

For MSMEs, however, one of the most important questions is:

Will these changes help businesses get paid faster and recover their dues more effectively?

The answer will depend not only on the provisions of the amended law but also on how effectively they are implemented.

Why Was the MSMED Act Changed?

The MSMED Act was enacted in 2006. Since then, the MSME sector has changed considerably.

Digital platforms have become an important part of business operations, MSME registrations have grown substantially, and platforms such as TReDS have become important tools for improving working capital access.

At the same time, late payments continue to put pressure on MSME cash flow.

When an MSME delivers goods or services but does not receive payment on time, its working capital remains stuck. This can affect salaries, inventory purchases, supplier payments, loan repayments and the ability to accept new orders.

The 2026 amendment therefore places considerable emphasis on timely payment and faster resolution of payment disputes.

1. Better Protection Against Late Payments

One of the most important changes is the strengthening of the mechanism for dealing with late payments to Micro and Small Enterprises.

The amendment introduces mechanisms intended to make payment disputes more time bound and improve recovery of amounts awarded to MSMEs.

If an MSME wins a payment dispute through mediation or arbitration, and the buyer still does not pay the amount due, the MSME can use a government recovery process to recover the money.

Like, If the buyer does not pay the amount awarded to the MSME, the amount can be recovered as arrears of land revenue through the District Collector, Deputy Commissioner or another authority notified by the State. This provides MSMEs with a stronger mechanism to recover their dues. 

Simple Example

Suppose an MSME supplies goods worth Rs. 10 lakh to a company, but the company does not pay.

The MSME takes the matter through the MSME dispute resolution process and receives an award saying:

Buyer must pay MSME Rs. 10 lakh.

If the buyer still does not pay, the amount can be recovered through the notified government authority.

2. 75% Payment Must Be Deposited if an Award Is Challenged

The amendment retains the requirement that a buyer challenging an award must deposit 75% of the awarded amount before the challenge can be entertained, subject to the applicable provisions.

This requirement is also extended to challenges against mediated settlement agreements covered under the amended framework.

For example, if an award requires a buyer to pay Rs. 20 lakh, the buyer would generally need to deposit Rs. 15 lakh before challenging it.

The provision is intended to discourage prolonged or unnecessary challenges and provide greater financial protection to MSME suppliers.

3. MSMEs Can Get 50% Payment After Six Months

Another important provision relates to cases where an award is challenged in court.

If the challenge remains pending for more than six months, the court is required to direct payment to the Micro or Small Enterprise supplier of at least 50% of the awarded amount from the amount deposited, subject to the applicable provisions.

For example, if the award is for Rs. 20 lakh, at least Rs. 10 lakh can be directed to the MSME supplier from the deposited amount once the challenge has remained pending for more than six months.

This means an MSME may not have to wait indefinitely for the outcome of prolonged litigation before receiving a substantial portion of the amount awarded.

For businesses operating with limited working capital, this can be important.

4. Faster Resolution of Payment Disputes

The amendment introduces specific timelines for mediation and arbitration.

The process broadly provides for:

90 days: Mediation

Mediation is required to be completed within 90 days from the date fixed for the first appearance.

30 days: Reference to Arbitration

If mediation is terminated without settlement, the matter is required to be referred for arbitration within 30 days.

90 days: Arbitration Award

The arbitral award is required to be made within 90 days from completion of pleadings.

This creates a clearer timeline for resolving late payment disputes.

The objective is straightforward:

Reduce the time between a payment dispute being raised and a decision being reached.

5. More Councils to Handle MSME Payment Disputes

The Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council, or MSEFC, plays an important role in resolving late payment disputes.

The amendment allows State Governments to establish one or more MSE Facilitation Councils.

States can also provide the councils with the necessary infrastructure, digital systems and trained manpower.

This is important because dispute resolution capacity needs to grow alongside the number of MSMEs.

According to the Government, 161 MSEFCs have been established across States and Union Territories.

The effectiveness of these councils will depend on their capacity to handle cases within the timelines prescribed by the amended framework.

Professionals Can Help MSMEs With Their Cases

Parties appearing before Facilitation Councils can be represented by professionals such as Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries and Cost and Management Accountants, subject to the applicable provisions.

This can be useful for MSMEs dealing with disputes involving invoices, financial records, contracts and other documentation.

For smaller businesses that may not have an in house legal or compliance team, professional support can make the process easier to manage.

More Experts Will Be Part of MSEFCs

The amended framework also provides for Facilitation Councils with three to five members.

The composition includes a government officer of the specified rank as Chairperson, representatives from industry associations and at least one member from the field of law.

The objective is to bring government, industry and legal expertise into the process of resolving MSME payment disputes.

6. TReDS Will Play a Bigger Role in MSME Payments

TReDS, the Trade Receivables Discounting System, is another major area of change.

TReDS enables MSMEs to finance or discount their trade receivables through multiple financiers. This can help businesses convert eligible receivables into funds instead of waiting until the buyer’s payment due date.

The amendment provides that all Central Public Sector Enterprises, or CPSEs, are required to settle invoices for goods and services procured from MSMEs through TReDS.

States may also mandate their Public Sector Enterprises, authorities or other entities to use TReDS for invoice settlement.

This moves TReDS beyond being viewed simply as an invoice financing platform.

It increasingly becomes part of the broader MSME payment infrastructure.

TReDS Invoices Will Have to Be Reported

The amendment also provides for reporting and disclosure of prescribed information relating to MSME invoices routed and settled through TReDS.

This can improve visibility into MSME invoices and their settlement status.

For MSMEs, better reporting can also help create a clearer record of the payment process.

TReDS Use Is Growing

Government data cited in the latest PIB backgrounder shows that the value of invoices discounted through TReDS increased from around Rs. 40,000 crore in 2022 to 2023 to Rs. 3.47 lakh crore in 2025 to 2026.

The growth indicates increasing adoption of digital receivables financing.

For MSMEs, greater use of TReDS could mean improved visibility and access to financing against eligible invoices, while buyers get a structured digital mechanism for invoice settlement.

7. Better Digital Tracking of Invoices

The amendment also places greater importance on digital records and traceability of invoices.

Digital records can help establish important details such as:

  • When an invoice was issued
  • When it was submitted
  • When it was accepted
  • When payment was made

This can reduce disputes over invoice dates, submission and payment status.

For example, if a buyer says that an invoice was submitted late, digital records can help establish the actual date on which it was submitted.

This can make the payment trail clearer and provide better documentation when a dispute arises.

8. MSME Payment Disputes Can Be Resolved Online

The amendment also strengthens the digital approach to dispute resolution.

The Government may establish an online mechanism for conducting mediation or arbitration.

The Online Dispute Resolution, or ODR, Portal, launched in June 2025, already provides a digital mechanism for resolving delayed payment disputes, including small value claims.

The proposed online mechanism can include tools such as video conferencing, electronic filing, electronic communication and recording of evidence.

For MSMEs, online dispute resolution can potentially reduce the cost and inconvenience associated with repeatedly appearing in physical proceedings.

The larger objective is to make dispute resolution more accessible, particularly for smaller businesses.

9. Awards and Settlements Get Stronger Legal Status

The amendment provides that amounts arising from mediated settlement agreements and arbitral awards can constitute legally enforceable debts and can be recognised under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, subject to applicable conditions.

This can become important when a buyer is facing financial difficulties and is unable to pay an MSME’s dues.

It gives greater legal recognition to amounts that become payable through the MSMED dispute resolution process.

10. Changes in MSME Registration and Classification

The amendment also updates the legal framework around MSME classification and registration.

MSME classification is based on two criteria:

  • Investment in plant and machinery or equipment
  • Turnover

The Bill gives the Central Government the power to prescribe the applicable classification thresholds through notification.

The amendment also provides for voluntary MSME registration for all .

The Government will notify a digital platform for MSME registration, while State Governments may also establish their own digital platforms.

This reinforces the shift towards digital and paperless MSME registration.

11. Some MSME Rules Will No Longer Carry Criminal Penalties

The amendment also changes the treatment of certain compliance related offences.

For some violations, the earlier conviction based approach is replaced with a system of warnings, penalties and fines depending on the nature and recurrence of the violation.

For example, furnishing incorrect information can result in a warning for the first instance, followed by monetary penalties for subsequent instances.

Similarly, non disclosure of unpaid dues by buyers moves towards a graded response involving a warning, penalty and fine for repeated instances.

The broader objective is to create a more trust based regulatory environment and improve ease of doing business.

Penalties for Giving False Registration Information

For wilfully providing false information for MSME registration, the first contravention would attract a warning.

Subsequent contraventions can attract monetary penalties ranging from Rs. 1,000 to Rs. 50,000, as applicable.

This creates a graded approach instead of immediately treating the violation as a criminal offence.

12. Penalties for Not Reporting MSME Dues

The amendment also introduces penalties for buyers who fail to report unpaid MSME dues as required in their annual accounts.

The proposed system is graded:

  • First contravention: Warning
  • Second contravention: Rs. 10,000 to Rs. 50,000
  • Subsequent contraventions: Rs. 50,000 to Rs. 1 lakh

This places greater importance on proper disclosure of outstanding MSME payments and can improve transparency around unpaid dues.

13. Penalties Will Increase Every Three Years

The amendment also provides for periodic increases in minimum penalty amounts.

The minimum penalties may increase by 10% every three years from the commencement of the Amendment Act, subject to the applicable provisions and notifications.

Businesses will therefore need to keep track of the applicable penalty levels as the provisions are implemented.

14. New Process for Penalties and Appeals

The amendment provides a formal process for dealing with specified violations.

The Development Commissioner will act as the adjudicating officer for these specified violations.

The amendment also provides an appeal mechanism against decisions of the adjudicating officer before the MSME Secretary, subject to the prescribed procedure and timelines.

This gives businesses a defined process to challenge an order where they believe it is incorrect.

What Do These Changes Mean for MSMEs?

The changes can be viewed through five practical areas.

Better Payment Protection

The amendment strengthens mechanisms for dealing with late payments and provides additional protection when awards remain under prolonged court challenge.

Faster Dispute Resolution

Defined timelines for mediation and arbitration are intended to reduce delays in payment related disputes.

Greater Use of Digital Platforms

TReDS and online dispute resolution mechanisms could reduce dependence on traditional processes and improve access to financing and dispute resolution.

Better Documentation

Digital invoice records can provide a clearer payment trail and help reduce disputes over invoices and payment dates.

Easier Compliance

Digital registration, professional support before MSEFCs and changes to certain penalties can simplify the regulatory environment for MSMEs.

How TReDS Can Help MSME Cash Flow

(Explore MSME TALK’s blog-BLOG:30- TReDS Platforms in India: Structure, Participants, and Latest Developments to understand how TReDS works, which platforms operate in India, and how to choose the right platform for your business)

The Real Impact Will Depend on Implementation

The amendment creates stronger provisions, but legislation alone cannot eliminate late payments.

The impact will depend on implementation.  

Some of the key factors will be:

  • How effectively MSEFCs meet the prescribed timelines
  • Availability of trained personnel
  • Adoption of digital dispute resolution systems
  • Compliance with TReDS requirements by CPSEs
  • Expansion of TReDS usage by other eligible entities
  • Speed of recovery after awards
  • Awareness among MSMEs about their rights and available mechanisms
  • Proper reporting of MSME invoices and dues

For MSMEs, awareness will be particularly important.

A legal provision can provide protection only when businesses know that the protection exists and understand how to use the available mechanisms.

What Should MSMEs Do Now?

MSMEs should focus on strengthening their own payment and documentation processes.

Businesses can:

  1. Maintain proper purchase orders, invoices and delivery records.
  2. Clearly document agreed payment terms.
  3. Track outstanding receivables regularly.
  4. Ensure their Udyam registration details are accurate and updated.
  5. Understand whether their buyers and transactions can be routed through TReDS.
  6. Keep digital records of invoices, delivery documents and payment communication.
  7. Keep documentation ready in case a payment dispute arises.
  8. Understand the MSEFC and online dispute resolution mechanisms available to them.
  9. Consider professional assistance where a payment dispute involves complex financial or compliance documentation.
  10. Monitor developments around the implementation of the amended provisions.

(Readers can also explore MSME TALK®’s detailed article on RXIL, India’s first TReDS platform: https://msmetalk.com/blog/blog-31-rxil-indias-first-treds-platform-for-msme-invoice-financing/  )

What Is the Bigger Change for MSMEs?

The MSMED Amendment Bill, 2026 is not limited to changing the classification or registration framework for MSMEs.

A significant part of the reform is about how MSMEs get paid, what happens when payments are delayed, and how quickly disputes can be resolved.

The stronger role for TReDS, defined timelines for mediation and arbitration, expanded MSEFC framework, 75% deposit requirement, recovery provisions, digital invoice records and protection during prolonged litigation collectively point towards a more structured payment ecosystem.

The bigger objective is to ensure that an MSME’s growth is not held back simply because its money is stuck with a buyer.

For MSMEs, the real measure of this reform will therefore not only be the law on paper, but whether it translates into faster payments, quicker dispute resolution, stronger cash flow visibility and better access to working capital on the ground.

(Listen to MSME TALK®’s discussion with CFOs of MSMEs in relation to TReDS and MSME invoice financing: https://youtu.be/s3feww6TGSY?si=7Wg-VFnuJ7iS41FU )

Conclusion

The MSMED Amendment Bill, 2026 represents an important update to a law that has governed India’s MSME ecosystem for two decades.

It focuses on Faster resolution, stronger payment mechanisms, better digital records and simpler compliance.

The proposed penalties are relatively small compared with the size of many MSME transactions . particularly for a large buyer/enterprise, a maximum penalty of ₹1 lakh may have limited deterrent value. However, the Bill’s stronger deterrent mechanisms are not the monetary penalties. They are: 

  • Mandatory TReDS routing of MSME invoices by CPSEs.
  • 75% mandatory deposit when a buyer challenges an award/mediated settlement.
  • If the challenge remains pending for more than six months, at least 50% of the awarded amount must be paid to the MSME supplier from that deposit.
  • Awards and mediated settlements can be recovered as arrears of land revenue.

Bill is low on monetary penalties, but significantly stronger on procedural and recovery mechanisms for MSME delayed-payment disputes with the help of technology. 

Stay Connected with MSME TALK®

Direct Access & Updates

Email Us

  • connect@msmetalk.com

Sign In

Register

Reset Password

Please enter your username or email address, you will receive a link to create a new password via email.